刘笑舒, 廖凤, 于栓宝, 李文革, 陈小萍, 吴媛, 卢金星. 咔哒唑胺与利奈唑胺对艰难梭菌的敏感性实验[J]. 疾病监测, 2017, 32(8): 683-686. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2017.08.017
引用本文: 刘笑舒, 廖凤, 于栓宝, 李文革, 陈小萍, 吴媛, 卢金星. 咔哒唑胺与利奈唑胺对艰难梭菌的敏感性实验[J]. 疾病监测, 2017, 32(8): 683-686. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2017.08.017
LIU Xiao-shu, LIAO Feng, YU Shuan-bao, LI Wen-ge, CHEN Xiao-ping, WU Yuan, LU Jin-xing. Sensitivity test of Clostridium difficile to cadazolid and linezolid[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2017, 32(8): 683-686. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2017.08.017
Citation: LIU Xiao-shu, LIAO Feng, YU Shuan-bao, LI Wen-ge, CHEN Xiao-ping, WU Yuan, LU Jin-xing. Sensitivity test of Clostridium difficile to cadazolid and linezolid[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2017, 32(8): 683-686. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2017.08.017

咔哒唑胺与利奈唑胺对艰难梭菌的敏感性实验

Sensitivity test of Clostridium difficile to cadazolid and linezolid

  • 摘要: 目的 比较咔哒唑胺与利奈唑胺对不同基因和毒素型别的艰难梭菌的抑菌效果,以及咔哒唑胺对艰难梭菌芽孢形成的影响。方法 采用咔哒唑胺与利奈唑胺对10株不同基因型别的艰难梭菌、1株产气荚膜梭菌和1株脆弱拟杆菌进行药物敏感性实验,获得各菌株测试药物对应的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)值。选取其中1株艰难梭菌ATCC BAA-1803,核糖体027型高毒株,试验咔哒唑胺对菌株芽孢形成的影响,从而对药物进行评价。结果 艰难梭菌咔哒唑胺MIC为0.25 g/ml(0.03~0.25 g/ml),利奈唑胺MIC为4.0 g/ml(0.5~16.0 g/ml),艰难梭菌咔哒唑胺MIC值低于利奈唑胺16倍。2种抗生素对不同基因型别与毒素型别的艰难梭菌均具有良好抑菌效果,同时对产气荚膜梭菌也具有抑菌效果。咔哒唑胺对脆弱拟杆菌不产生抑菌效果,利奈唑胺对其有抑菌效果。咔哒唑胺能抑制艰难梭菌芽孢形成。结论 临床常见的不同基因型和毒素型别的艰难梭菌对咔哒唑胺敏感,咔哒唑胺可用于治疗艰难梭菌感染。

     

    Abstract: Objective To compare the antibacterial effect of cadazolid and linezolid to Clostridium difficile with different genotype and toxin type, and the effect of cadazolid on the formation of C. difficile spores. Methods The sensitivity of 10 strains of C. difficile, 1 strain of C. lostridium perfringens and 1 strain of Bacteroides fragilis to cadazolid and linezolid were tested. The MICs of cadazolid and linezolid to the tested strains were obtained. One strain of C. difficile(ATCC BAA-1803, RT027) was selected to evaluate the effect of cadazolid on the spore formation of the strain. Results The MIC of cadazolid to C. difficile was 0.25 g/ml (0.03-0.25 g/ml), the MIC of linezolid to C. difficile was 4.0 g/ml (0.5-16.0 g/ml), the MIC of cadazolid was 16 times lower than that of linezolid. The two antibiotics had good antibacterial effect to C. difficile with different genotype and toxin type, and also had antibacterial effect on C. perfringens. Cadazolid had no inhibitory effect on B. fragilis, while linezolid had such effect. Cadazolid could inhibit the formation of C. difficile spores. Conclusion C. difficile is sensitive to cadazolid, indicating thatcadazolid is effective in the clinical treatment of C. difficile infection.

     

/

返回文章
返回