徐娜, 刘长娜, 夏卫东, 陈虹, 刘军. 基于改良TOPSIS法的天津市传染病信息报告质量综合评价[J]. 疾病监测, 2020, 35(6): 552-556. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2020.06.020
引用本文: 徐娜, 刘长娜, 夏卫东, 陈虹, 刘军. 基于改良TOPSIS法的天津市传染病信息报告质量综合评价[J]. 疾病监测, 2020, 35(6): 552-556. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2020.06.020
Na Xu, Changna Liu, Weidong Xia, Hong Chen, Jun Liu. Comprehensive evaluation of quality of communicable disease information reporting in Tianjin based on improved TOPSIS method[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2020, 35(6): 552-556. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2020.06.020
Citation: Na Xu, Changna Liu, Weidong Xia, Hong Chen, Jun Liu. Comprehensive evaluation of quality of communicable disease information reporting in Tianjin based on improved TOPSIS method[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2020, 35(6): 552-556. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2020.06.020

基于改良TOPSIS法的天津市传染病信息报告质量综合评价

Comprehensive evaluation of quality of communicable disease information reporting in Tianjin based on improved TOPSIS method

  • 摘要:
    目的对2018年天津市法定传染病信息报告质量进行综合评价。
    方法应用改良的TOPSIS法,综合机构网络运行情况、传染病报告率、卡片报告及时性、卡片审核及时性、卡片重复报告、患者身份信息填写情况等指标对天津市各区法定传染病信息报告质量进行综合评价。
    结果利用改良TOPSIS法综合评价结果显示,报告质量居前3位的区分别为河东、西青、红桥区,居后3位的区分别为河西、东丽、静海区。 综合评价结果很好地区分了各地区报告质量的优劣,排序结果反映了实际报告质量的高低。
    结论利用传染病报告信息系统中的报告质量和医疗机构现场调查报告质量的指标,全面、科学地评价各地区传染病信息报告质量的优劣,构建的评价体系和方法为全国和其他省市传染病信息报告质量综合评价提供了可借鉴的模式。

     

    Abstract:
    ObjectiveTo comprehensively evaluate the quality of the communicable disease information reporting in Tianjin in 2018.
    MethodsInstitutional network operation, communicable disease reporting rate, card reporting timeliness, card review timeliness, card duplication reporting and completeness the patient's identity information in each district of Tianjin were analyzed by using an improved TOPSIS method.
    ResultsThe results of the comprehensive evaluation by using the improved TOPSIS method showed that the top three districts with high reporting quality were Hedong, Xiqing and Hongqiao, and the last three districts with low reporting quality were Hexi, Dongli and Jinghai. The comprehensive evaluation results indicated the quality of the reporting of each district, and the ranking of the reporting quality reflected actual situation.
    ConclusionComprehensively and scientifically evaluation of the quality of communicable disease information reporting in each district in Tianjin was conducted based on the indicators of the reporting quality in communicable disease reporting information system and in field investigation report of medical institution, and the related evaluation system and method provided a novel model for the comprehensive evaluation of the quality of communicable disease information reporting in China or in other provinces.

     

/

返回文章
返回