金世文, 段建军, 田桢, 郝琴, 侯学霞, 耿震, 吕冰, 蒋毅, 万康林. 400例莱姆病病例临床疾病类型及其治疗效果分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2005, 20(7): 356-359. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2005.7.356
引用本文: 金世文, 段建军, 田桢, 郝琴, 侯学霞, 耿震, 吕冰, 蒋毅, 万康林. 400例莱姆病病例临床疾病类型及其治疗效果分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2005, 20(7): 356-359. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2005.7.356
JIN Shi-wen, DUAN Jian-Jun, Tian Zhen, HAO Qin, HOU Xue-xia, GENG Zhen, LV Bing, JIANG Yi, WAN Kang-lin. Analysis on Clinic Type and Therapeutic Efficacy of 400 Cases of Lyme Disease[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2005, 20(7): 356-359. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2005.7.356
Citation: JIN Shi-wen, DUAN Jian-Jun, Tian Zhen, HAO Qin, HOU Xue-xia, GENG Zhen, LV Bing, JIANG Yi, WAN Kang-lin. Analysis on Clinic Type and Therapeutic Efficacy of 400 Cases of Lyme Disease[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2005, 20(7): 356-359. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2005.7.356

400例莱姆病病例临床疾病类型及其治疗效果分析

Analysis on Clinic Type and Therapeutic Efficacy of 400 Cases of Lyme Disease

  • 摘要: 目的分析莱姆病临床表现及其治疗效果,为莱姆病的临床治疗探索优化的治疗方案。方法根据莱姆病暴露史、临床表现和实验室检查确诊莱姆病患者,对其不同临床类型疾病,分别进行口服治疗和静脉给药,比较两者的治疗效果。结果本次共确认莱姆病患者400例,其中关节炎94例、神经肌肉炎92例、心脏损害36例,慢性轻度脑膜炎32例,和慢性疲劳综合征146例。两种治疗方案均有显著疗效,治愈率分别为88.45%和79.17%。且不良反应较少。结论莱姆病临床疾病类型复杂多样,两种方法对莱姆病有较好的治疗效果。

     

    Abstract: Objective This analysis was made to analyze clinical manifestations and therapeutic efficacy of Lyme disease SO as to explore optimized treatment protocols.Methods Diseases of differ-ent clinical types were treated through oral and intravascular administration respectively and efficacies were compared in terms of exposure history,clinical manifestations and patients confirmed during lab inspection.Results 400 cases of Lyme disease were verified in this study,including 94 cases of arthritis,92 cases of neuromuscular inflammation,36 cases of hear injury,32 cases of chronic mild meningitis and 46 cases of chronic fatigue syndrome.Both therapeutic protocols showed remarkable effectiveness,with a curative rate of 88.45% and 79.17% respectively,with few side effects seen.Conclusion Although there are various types of lyme disease in the clinic.Both methods have good therapeutic effectiveness.

     

/

返回文章
返回