陈小英, 李燕琴, 王学良. 2008年陕西省宝鸡市传染病疫情报告质量评价[J]. 疾病监测, 2010, 25(7): 585-588. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2010.07.024
引用本文: 陈小英, 李燕琴, 王学良. 2008年陕西省宝鸡市传染病疫情报告质量评价[J]. 疾病监测, 2010, 25(7): 585-588. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2010.07.024
CHEN Xiao-ying, LI Yan-qin, WANG Xue-liang. Evaluation of report quality of infectious disease in Baojj city, 2008[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2010, 25(7): 585-588. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2010.07.024
Citation: CHEN Xiao-ying, LI Yan-qin, WANG Xue-liang. Evaluation of report quality of infectious disease in Baojj city, 2008[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2010, 25(7): 585-588. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2010.07.024

2008年陕西省宝鸡市传染病疫情报告质量评价

Evaluation of report quality of infectious disease in Baojj city, 2008

  • 摘要: 目的 评价实行网络直报后陕西省宝鸡市2008年传染病疫情报告的质量状况与网络运行情况,探讨影响该市传染病疫情报告质量的主要原因,影响报告与审核及时性的原因,从而提高该市传染病疫情报告质量。 方法 通过《中国疾病预防控制信息系统》的子系统《疾病监测信息报告管理系统》获取宝鸡市2008年乙、丙类传染病报告卡,从系统中导出Excel数据库进行统计分析。 结果 宝鸡市传染病报告单位以综合医院为主,占76.29%;各级医疗机构直报率为89.05%,其中综合医院直报率达89.87%,乡镇卫生院直报率达96.75%;2008年传染病报告及时率为99.71%,较2007年上升了3.20%,审核及时率为99.84%,较2007年上升了1.06%。2008年重复报告1张,误报4次,无未审核卡片,无零、缺报。 结论 报告、审核及时性和重复报告卡片是影响宝鸡市传染病疫情报告质量最主要的原因;各县(区)传染病疫情报告质量参差不齐;网络直报工作有待进一步规范管理。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the quality of communicable disease reporting after the implementation of network direct reporting in Baoji, Shaanxi province, explore the influence factors. Methods The reporting data of class B and C communicable diseases in Baoji in 2008 were obtained from national disease reporting information system and analyzed statistically. Results Communicable disease reporting was mainly from general hospital, accounting for 76.29% of the total, The overall direct reporting rate was 89.05% for the medical institutions at all level with 89.87% in general hospital and 96.75% in township health centers.The rate of timely epidemic reporting was up to 99.71%, an increase of 3.20% compared with 2007.The timely verification rate was 99.84%, an increased of 1.06% compared with 2007. One duplicated reporting card and four misreporting cards were found, No non-verified reporting and underreporting were found. Conclusion Timeliness of reporting and its verification or duplicated reporting were the major factors to influence the reporting quality in Baojj. Since the reporting quality varied by different counties and districts, the standard management of network direct reporting needs further improved.

     

/

返回文章
返回