谢忠杭, 洪荣涛, 李宏, 向建军, 黄文龙. 2005 - 2009年福建省肺结核重复报告情况分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2010, 25(7): 589-592. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2010.07.025
引用本文: 谢忠杭, 洪荣涛, 李宏, 向建军, 黄文龙. 2005 - 2009年福建省肺结核重复报告情况分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2010, 25(7): 589-592. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2010.07.025
XIE Zhong-hang, HONG Rong-tao, LI Hong, XIANG Jian-jun, HUANG Wen-long. Duplicate reports of pulmonary tuberculosis in Fujian, 2005 - 2009[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2010, 25(7): 589-592. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2010.07.025
Citation: XIE Zhong-hang, HONG Rong-tao, LI Hong, XIANG Jian-jun, HUANG Wen-long. Duplicate reports of pulmonary tuberculosis in Fujian, 2005 - 2009[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2010, 25(7): 589-592. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2010.07.025

2005 - 2009年福建省肺结核重复报告情况分析

Duplicate reports of pulmonary tuberculosis in Fujian, 2005 - 2009

  • 摘要: 目的 分析福建省2005 - 2009年肺结核重复报告情况并提出控制建议。 方法 对《疾病监测信息报告管理系统》的报告卡运用 SAS 9.0软件进行分析。 结果 查重时应以患者姓名、性别、病种、现住地址国标编码信息且重卡间年龄相差2岁为重卡判定条件;各年度内重卡构成比总体呈逐年下降趋势,从2005年的2.64%下降到2009年的0.82%;各年度间重报现象大致维持稳定,5年平均为6.61%;跨年度重卡构成比与年份间跨度呈负相关,跨度为1年时平均有2.39%的报告卡属重复报告信息,2年时有1.42%,3年时有0.95%,4年时有0.64%。 结论 重复报告现象已严重影响了报告发病率,应加强其控制工作。建议增设查重新指标、填写并完善卡片的身份证号码信息。

     

    Abstract: Objective To analyze the duplicate reports of pulmonary tuberculosis in Fujian from 2005 to 2009, offering recommendations for improving the report quality. Methods Report cards of the Disease Surveillance Information Report and Management System were analyzed using SAS 9.0. Results Reporting cards with identical patient name, sex, disease, national standard code of current address, where the discrepancy in age was not more than 2 years, were deemed duplicate. The annual constituent of duplicate reports decreased to 0.82% in 2009 from 2.64% in 2005 with an overall declining trend. Duplicate reports were stably present in separate years with a 5-year average incidence of 6.61%. Negatively correlated with the span, the cross-year constituent of duplicate reports averaged 2.39% in a 1-year length and 1.42%, 0.95% and 0.64% in a 2-year, 3-year and 4-year span, respectively. Conclusion Duplicate reports severely compromised the reported incidence rate, thereby entailing a prompt improvement in duplicate finding. Additional duplicate detection indicators and completion of identity card numbers are recommended.

     

/

返回文章
返回