秦倩倩, 王璐, 丁正伟, 王丽艳, 黑发欣, 李培龙, 陈方方. 2010年中国艾滋病疫情网络直报质量分析及指标探讨[J]. 疾病监测, 2012, 27(12): 1007-1012. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2012.12.024
引用本文: 秦倩倩, 王璐, 丁正伟, 王丽艳, 黑发欣, 李培龙, 陈方方. 2010年中国艾滋病疫情网络直报质量分析及指标探讨[J]. 疾病监测, 2012, 27(12): 1007-1012. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2012.12.024
QIN Qian-qian, WANG Lu, DING Zheng-wei, WANG Li-yan, HEI Fa-xin, LI Pei-long, CHEN Fang-fang. Evaluation of AIDS network direct reporting quality and related indicators in China, 2010[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2012, 27(12): 1007-1012. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2012.12.024
Citation: QIN Qian-qian, WANG Lu, DING Zheng-wei, WANG Li-yan, HEI Fa-xin, LI Pei-long, CHEN Fang-fang. Evaluation of AIDS network direct reporting quality and related indicators in China, 2010[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2012, 27(12): 1007-1012. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2012.12.024

2010年中国艾滋病疫情网络直报质量分析及指标探讨

Evaluation of AIDS network direct reporting quality and related indicators in China, 2010

  • 摘要: 目的 分析2010年艾滋病疫情网络直报数据质量,发现网络直报工作存在的问题,以采取相应措施,加强管理,提高艾滋病疫情报告质量,并为拟制定的管理指标提供参考依据。方法 2011年1月1日下载艾滋病网络直报系统中2010年报告获得性免疫缺陷综合征(acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, AIDS,艾滋病)/人类免疫缺陷病毒(human immunodeficiency virus, HIV,艾滋病病毒)的定时数据库及相关工作表,对艾滋病网络直报个案数据进行准确性、完整性、及时性的统计分析。结果 2010年全国5384个报告机构共报告HIV感染者及AIDS患者62 382例。2010年全国报告及时率为80.1%;部分病例报告填写存在逻辑错误;身份证号、联系电话、工作单位等部分非必填项填写率较低;全国完成流行病学调查完成率(流调率)为94.0%,流调及时率为88.5%。2010年全国死亡报告及时率为72.5%,主要死因和其他死因填写不规范。结论 2010年艾滋病报告的流调率和及时率等指标较2008年、2009年进一步得到提高,但仍存在部分问题,在今后的工作中应进行调整完善和针对性地加强。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the quality of HIV/AIDS online case reporting in 2010 for the purpose of improving reporting quality and providing a scientific basis for the establishment of indicators for management and evaluation. Methods The data and related working tables of national HIV/AIDS online case reporting in 2010 were downloaded in January,2011, and the factors influencing reporting quality were analyzed. Results A total of 62382 HIV/AIDS diseases cards were reported from 5384 medical institutions in China in 2010. The timely reporting rate was 80.1%. Filling mistakes were found in some cases. Some items such as numbers of identification cards, telephone, and work unit were missed. Epidemiological surveys were conducted on 94.0% of the cases and the timely rate of epidemiological survey was 88.5%. The timely reporting rate of death cases was 72.5%.There were some problems about filling in the main cause of death and other causes of death. Conclusion The timeliness of case reporting and epidemiological survey rate in 2010 were higher than those in 2008 and 2009. With the problems identified, improvement will have to be made in future work.

     

/

返回文章
返回