吴海霞, 刘起勇, 刘小波, 鲁亮, 郭玉红, 岳玉娟. 2006-2013年中国19省白纹伊蚊监测数据分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2015, 30(4): 310-315. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2015.04.016
引用本文: 吴海霞, 刘起勇, 刘小波, 鲁亮, 郭玉红, 岳玉娟. 2006-2013年中国19省白纹伊蚊监测数据分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2015, 30(4): 310-315. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2015.04.016
WU Hai-xia, LIU Qi-yong, LIU Xiao-bo, LU Liang, GUO Yu-hong, YUE Yu-juan. Surveillance for Aedes albopictus in China,2006-2013[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2015, 30(4): 310-315. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2015.04.016
Citation: WU Hai-xia, LIU Qi-yong, LIU Xiao-bo, LU Liang, GUO Yu-hong, YUE Yu-juan. Surveillance for Aedes albopictus in China,2006-2013[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2015, 30(4): 310-315. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2015.04.016

2006-2013年中国19省白纹伊蚊监测数据分析

Surveillance for Aedes albopictus in China,2006-2013

  • 摘要: 目的 了解我国19个省病媒生物监测点白纹伊蚊密度消长趋势,为白纹伊蚊及相关传染病预防控制提供依据. 方法 收集整理2006-2013年全国病媒生物监测系统中诱蚊灯法在居民区、公园、医院、农户、牲畜棚环境监测的白纹伊蚊数据,按监测点所在温度带、降水带,进行不同监测生境、月份、年份和温度带白纹伊蚊密度差异的统计学分析. 结果 2006-2013年全国白纹伊蚊总密度为0.036只/(灯h).不同生境白纹伊蚊平均密度差异有统计学意义,牲畜棚和农户环境中白纹伊蚊密度较高,且都是7月密度最高,而公园、医院和居民区7-8月密度均较高;白纹伊蚊密度最高年份为2006年,其后密度明显下降,2010年和2013年略有回升.不同温度带白纹伊蚊密度差异有统计学意义,热带的白纹伊蚊密度最高,达0.091只/(灯h),其后依次为亚热带、暖温带,中温带监测点未监测到白纹伊蚊;暖温带的密度高峰出现在8月,晚于亚热带的7月;热带的白纹伊蚊密度全年有2个高峰,分别出现在7月和10月;热带地区白纹伊蚊密度2010-2012年出现明显的上升.不同降水带中,发现白纹伊蚊分布的3个降水带白纹伊蚊密度差异有统计学意义,年降水量400~800 mm区域的白纹伊蚊密度最高,达13.89只/(灯h),其后依次为800~1600 mm、 1600 mm区域, 400 mm区域未发现白纹伊蚊;不同降水带中白纹伊蚊密度全年均呈单峰曲线,年均降水量400~800 mm区域白纹伊蚊密度全年最高峰出现在9月,800~1600 mm区域密度最高峰出现在8月, 1600 mm区域6-11月密度均较高; 1600 mm区域密度在2008年后一直缓慢上升. 结论 不同监测环境、温度带、降水带、月份、年份的白纹伊蚊密度存在差异,提示在白纹伊蚊及相关传染病的预防控制上不同的生境、温度带(地区)、月份应采取更有针对性的措施.

     

    Abstract: Objective To understand the population density and seasonal fluctuation of Aedes albopictus in China and provide evidence for the prevention and control of Ae. albopictus and related diseases. Methods The surveillance data of Ae. albopictus from 41 national surveillance sites during 2006-2013 were collected. The density and seasonal/annual fluctuation of Ae. albopictus in different environments, temperature zones and precipitation belts were compared. Results From 2006 to 2013, the overall average density of Ae. albopictus was 0.036 mosquito/(light hour). The difference in the density in 5 environments had statistical significance. Of five different environments, the density of Ae. albopictus in livestock yards(0.067) or in farmyards(0.046) was high with density peak in July, the density peak was observed in July and August in parks, hospitals and residential areas. The annual density was highest in 2006. The difference in the density among different temperature zones was statistical significant. The density in tropical zone was highest, followed by subtropical zone and warm temperature zone. and no Ae. albopictus was found in mid-temperature zone. Two annual density peaks were observed in July and in October in tropical zone, but only one annual density peak was observed in warm temperature zone(in August) and in semitropical zone(in July). The annual density in tropical zone increased obviously during 2010-2012. The difference in density in different precipitation belts was statistical significant. The density in the belt with annual precipitation 400-800 mm was highest(13.89), followed by that in the belts with annual precipitation 800-1600 mm and 1600 mm. No Ae. albopictus was found in the belt with annual precipitation400 mm. The annual density peak occurred in September in the belt with annual precipitation 400-800 mm, which was one month later than that in the belt with annual precipitation 800-1600 mm(August). The density peak was during June-November in the belt with annual precipitation 1600 mm The annual density was in slow increase in the belt with annual precipitation 1600 mm from 2008 to 2013. Conclusion The density of Ae. albopictus varied with environment, month, year, temperature zone and precipitation belt. It is necessary to take more specific measures for the prevention and control of Ae. albopictus and related diseases.

     

/

返回文章
返回