刘天, 程勋杰, 姚梦雷, 黄继贵, 刘予希, 陈红缨. 移动流行区间法在手足口病监测预警中的应用[J]. 疾病监测, 2019, 34(4): 348-353. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2019.04.015
引用本文: 刘天, 程勋杰, 姚梦雷, 黄继贵, 刘予希, 陈红缨. 移动流行区间法在手足口病监测预警中的应用[J]. 疾病监测, 2019, 34(4): 348-353. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2019.04.015
Tian Liu, Xunjie Chen, Menglei Yao, Jigui Huang, Yuxi Liu, Hongying Chen. Application of moving epidemic method in surveillance and early warning of hand foot and mouth disease[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2019, 34(4): 348-353. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2019.04.015
Citation: Tian Liu, Xunjie Chen, Menglei Yao, Jigui Huang, Yuxi Liu, Hongying Chen. Application of moving epidemic method in surveillance and early warning of hand foot and mouth disease[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2019, 34(4): 348-353. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2019.04.015

移动流行区间法在手足口病监测预警中的应用

Application of moving epidemic method in surveillance and early warning of hand foot and mouth disease

  • 摘要:
    目的探讨移动流行区间法在手足口病监测预警中的可行性。
    方法采用移动流行区间法对荆州市2010 — 2017年第4 — 37周手足口病周发病率数据进行交叉验证,筛选适用于建模的历史数据。 筛选指标包括灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、马修相关系数和约登指数。 利用已筛选出的历史数据建立2018年第4 — 37周监测预警模型,评价2018年荆州市手足口病流行趋势。
    结果交叉验证结果显示2011年和2013年拟合效果较差,予以剔除。 利用2010、2012、2014、2015、2016和2017年数据建模,最优参数 \delta 值为2.5,灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、马修相关系数和约登指数分别为0.94、0.93、0.92、0.95、13.57、0.06、0.87、0.87。 2018年自第18周进入流行期,流行期为低流行水平。
    结论移动流行区间法能特异性识别手足口病流行,可用于制定荆州市手足口病春夏季流行阈值。

     

    Abstract:
    ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of application of moving epidemic method in surveillance and early warning of hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD).
    MethodsMoving epidemic method was used for the cross validation of the incidence data of HFMD in Jingzhou from 4 to 37 weeks during 2010–2017. The evaluation indicators included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, Matthew correlation coefficient and Yoden index. The selected historical data were used to establish a surveillance and early warning model for 4–37 weeks in 2018 and evaluate the trend of HFMD in Jingzhou in 2018.
    ResultsThe cross validation results showed that the fitting effects in 2011 and 2013 were poor, which were eliminated. Data in 2010, 2012, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 were used to establish a surveillance model of the moving epidemic method. The optimal parameter value of \delta was 2.5. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, Matthew correlation coefficient and Yoden index were 0.94, 0.93, 0.92, 0.95, 13.57, 0.06, 0.87 and 0.87, respectively. The epidemic started to occur in 18th week in 2018, the incidence level was low.
    ConclusionThe method produced a robust and specific signal to detect HFMD epidemic, and can be used to establish the spring and summer epidemic threshold of HFMD in Jingzhou.

     

/

返回文章
返回