张景山, 赵文轩, 陈美玲, 杜小莉, 赵林, 王紫鉴, 肖文静, 张巍巍, 赵宏群, 李杰, 刁保卫, 阚飙, 逄波. 基于基因组序列的副溶血弧菌两种分型方法比较研究[J]. 疾病监测, 2021, 36(5): 457-461. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202011050373
引用本文: 张景山, 赵文轩, 陈美玲, 杜小莉, 赵林, 王紫鉴, 肖文静, 张巍巍, 赵宏群, 李杰, 刁保卫, 阚飙, 逄波. 基于基因组序列的副溶血弧菌两种分型方法比较研究[J]. 疾病监测, 2021, 36(5): 457-461. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202011050373
Zhang Jingshan, Zhao Wenxuan, Chen Meiling, Du Xiaoli, Zhao Lin, Wang Zijian, Xiao Wenjing, Zhang Weiwei, Zhao Hongqun, Li Jie, Diao Baowei, Kan Biao, Pang Bo. Comparison of the two typing methods based on the genome sequence for Vibrio parahaemolyticus[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2021, 36(5): 457-461. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202011050373
Citation: Zhang Jingshan, Zhao Wenxuan, Chen Meiling, Du Xiaoli, Zhao Lin, Wang Zijian, Xiao Wenjing, Zhang Weiwei, Zhao Hongqun, Li Jie, Diao Baowei, Kan Biao, Pang Bo. Comparison of the two typing methods based on the genome sequence for Vibrio parahaemolyticus[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2021, 36(5): 457-461. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202011050373

基于基因组序列的副溶血弧菌两种分型方法比较研究

Comparison of the two typing methods based on the genome sequence for Vibrio parahaemolyticus

  • 摘要:
      目的  比较基于全基因组测序(WGS)SNP的分型方案和多位点串联重复序列分析(MLVA)分型方案用于我国副溶血弧菌分子分型的能力,并分析两种方法的优缺点及适用情况。
      方法  选取我国分离的56株副溶血弧菌,使用6个数目可变串联重复序列(VNTR)位点的MLVA方案和基于全基因组序列SNP的方案对这些菌株进行分子分型分析,通过量化指标评价这两种方法对我国分离的副溶血弧菌的分型能力。
      结果  56株副溶血弧菌经MLVA分型,获得31种MLVA型,D值为0.949。 对56株副溶血弧菌进行全基因组测序,获得33个差异明显的基因型,D值为0.967。 两种分型方法对菌株的分辨能力十分接近,分型结果高度一致。
      结论  6位点的MLVA分型方案与基于全基因组测序SNP的分型方案具有相似的分型能力,其分型能力稍弱。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To compare the ability of the whole-genome sequencing (WGS)  single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) typing scheme with the multilocus tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) typing scheme for molecular typing of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated in China, and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods.
      Methods  The MLVA scheme with six  Variable number of tandemrepeats (VNTR) loci and the SNP scheme based on the whole genome sequence were used to analyze the molecular typing of 56 strains of V. parahaemolyticus isolated in China, and evaluate the effects of these two methods with the isolates in China with quantitative indicators.
      Results  Thirty-one MLVA types were obtained from 56 strains of V. parahaemolyticus by MLVA and the D value was 0.949. Thirty-three core genome SNP types were obtained in the same collection of strains by core genome SNP typing and the D value was 0.967. The discriminatory ability of the two typing methods is very close, and the typing results are highly consistent.
      Conclusion  The 6-site MLVA typing scheme has similar typing capabilities to the typing scheme based on core genome SNP.

     

/

返回文章
返回