高级检索
蒋国钦, 徐燕, 傅盈, 官进华, 胡宇涵, 方益荣, 刘钦梅. 不同生境下布雷图指数法与诱蚊诱卵器法监测白纹伊蚊的比较研究[J]. 疾病监测, 2021, 36(9): 902-905. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202105270289
引用本文: 蒋国钦, 徐燕, 傅盈, 官进华, 胡宇涵, 方益荣, 刘钦梅. 不同生境下布雷图指数法与诱蚊诱卵器法监测白纹伊蚊的比较研究[J]. 疾病监测, 2021, 36(9): 902-905. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202105270289
shu
Jiang Guoqin, Xu Yan, Fu Ying, Guan Jinhua, Hu Yuhan, Fang Yirong, Liu Qinmei. Comparative study on the surveillance of Aedes albopictus by Breteau index and Mosq-ovitrap index in different habitats[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2021, 36(9): 902-905. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202105270289
Citation: Jiang Guoqin, Xu Yan, Fu Ying, Guan Jinhua, Hu Yuhan, Fang Yirong, Liu Qinmei. Comparative study on the surveillance of Aedes albopictus by Breteau index and Mosq-ovitrap index in different habitats[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2021, 36(9): 902-905. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202105270289
shu

不同生境下布雷图指数法与诱蚊诱卵器法监测白纹伊蚊的比较研究

Comparative study on the surveillance of Aedes albopictus by Breteau index and Mosq-ovitrap index in different habitats

    摘要
  • 摘要:
      目的   通过现场试验的方法，比较不同生境下布雷图指数法与诱蚊诱卵器法在白纹伊蚊监测中的应用，为两种监测方法的应用和评价提供依据。
      方法   2020年4—12月，选择浙江省绍兴市柯桥区和新昌县的城镇居民区和农村居民区，每月上、中、下旬分别应用布雷图指数（BI）法和诱蚊诱卵器（MOI）法监测白纹伊蚊幼虫密度，分析两种监测方法相关性。
      结果   BI法共入户调查10 718户，发现阳性积水容器745只，BI为6.95，其中柯桥区BI为6.98，新昌县BI为6.92。 7月为城镇居民区BI峰值（11.28），农村居民区峰值出现在5月（BI为12.67）。 共布放诱蚊诱卵器11 837个，回收有效诱蚊诱卵器11 657个，阳性诱卵器189个，MOI为1.62，其中，柯桥区MOI为2.37，高于新昌县（0.75）。 城镇居民区MOI为1.80，高于农村居民区（1.44）。 相关性分析发现，绍兴市总体BI与MOI有统计学相关关系（r=0.676，P=0.046）、新昌县BI与MOI有统计学相关关系（r=0.794，P=0.011）、城镇居民区的BI与MOI有统计学相关关系（r=0.691, P=0.039）。
      结论   MOI法和BI法均可用于绍兴市白纹伊蚊现场监测，但两种方法在农村居民区和城镇居民区监测中的敏感性不同。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective   To compare Mosq-ovitrap index (MOI) and Breteau index (BI) of Aedes albopictus in two types of surveillance area through field experiments, and provide the basis for application and evaluation of two surveillance methods.
      Methods   From April to December of 2020, Keqiao district with local transmission of dengue fever and Xinchang county without dengue fever transmission were selected as two surveillance areas in Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province. The density of Aedes albopictus larvae was monitored by BI and MOI at 10 day interval in a month, respectively.
      Results   A total of 10 718 households were investigated, and 745 positive water containers were found, with a BI of 6.95. The BI in Keqiao district (6.98) was similar to that in Xinchang county (6.92). The peak value of BI was 11.28 in urban residential area in July, while 12.67 in rural residential area in May. A total of 11 837 mosq-ovitraps were placed around the BI investigated households, and the MOI was 1.62, while 189 mosq-ovitraps were found to be positive. The MOI was 2.37 in Keqiao district, higher than that in Xinchang county (MOI: 0.75). The MOI in urban residential area was 1.80, higher than that in rural residential area (MOI: 1.44). Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was a statistical correlation between BI and MOI Shaoxing (r=0.676, P=0.046), also in Xinchang county (r= 0.794, P=0.011) and urban residential areas (r=0.691, P=0.039).
      Conclusion   Mosq-ovitrap and Breteau index were effective indicators in the monitoring of Aedes albopictus, but with different sensitivity in rural and urban residential areas.

     

    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(14)
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)

/

返回文章
返回

在线交流