呼吸道传染病大流行早期药物动态优化分配策略研究

Study of dynamic optimization of drug allocation strategies in early stage of respiratory infectious disease pandemic

  • 摘要:
    目的 本研究旨在新发呼吸道传染病大流行早期,在资源受限且供给动态增长的双重约束下合理制定药物动态分配策略,以最大程度降低累计死亡人数,为资源受限时物资分配提供科学依据。
    方法 构建基于分年龄组的易感者–潜伏者–未治疗感染者–治疗感染者–康复者–死亡者(SEIuItRD)传染病动力学模型,纳入药物治疗对康复率和病死率的影响,并采用logistic S型函数模拟药物生产能力由紧缺向饱和的动态增长过程。以累计死亡人数最少为优化目标,将150d疫情模拟周期划分为15个决策阶段,构建多阶段非线性优化模型,采用序列二次规划算法求解最优分配比例,并与按人口比例分配的基准策略及病死率高人群优先策略进行比较,对关键参数进行灵敏度分析。
    结果 与按人口比例分配的基准策略相比,动态优化策略使累计死亡人数降低了16.10%。最优分配方案呈现出明显的“3阶段”特征:在疫情初期感染人数较少,药物资源约束较小时按人口比例分配;进入疫情高峰期后将药物资源高度集中于老年群体,儿童与成年人的分配比例则降至零,90~100 d将12.36%分给成年人组、87.64%分给老年人组,100~110 d将3.00%分给儿童组、94.39%分给成年人组、2.61%分给老年人组;疫情后期分配比例调整为按人口比例分配。灵敏度分析结果表明,随着药物效力从0.50提升至0.95,所有策略下的累计死亡人数均随之下降。产能增长率k从0.01提升至0.10,3种策略下的累计死亡人数均呈现显著下降,k到达0.07时病死率高人群优先策略优于基准策略和动态优化策略。
    结论 在药物供给受限的呼吸道传染病大流行早期,基于多阶段优化的动态药物分配策略能够显著降低疫情死亡负担。根据药物产能变化动态调整分配方案,是实现公共卫生效益最大化的有效途径。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To develop a rational dynamic drug allocation strategy in the early stage of emerging respiratory infectious disease pandemic when resource supplies are limited but more supplies are needed, minimize the fatal case count in the pandemic and provide scientific evidence for the resource allocation in the context of limited supply.
    Method An infectious disease dynamics model of susceptible persons, latent infection case, untreated infection cases, treated infection cases, recovered persons death cases (SEIuItRD) was constructed based on age groups to analyze the impact of pharmacotherapy on recovery and death rates. The dynamic growth process of pharmacy production from shortage to saturation was simulated by using Logistic S-shaped function. The simulated 150-d pandemic period was divided into 15 decision-making stages, and a multi-stage nonlinear optimization model was constructed. The sequential quadratic programming algorithm was used to calculate the optimal allocation ratio for the comparison with the benchmark allocation strategy based on population proportion and the specific strategy for population at high death risk. Sensitivity analysis was conducted on key parameters.
    Results Compared with the benchmark allocation strategy based on population proportion, the dynamic optimization strategy reduced the cumulative fatal cases by 16.10%. The optimal allocation plan exhibited a distinct "three-stage" characteristics: in the early stage of the pandemic, when the number of infections was small and the constraint of drug resources was relatively low, the drug allocation was made based on population proportion. In the incidence peak period of the pandemic, the drug resources were highly allocated to elderly group, while the allocation proportions for children and adults were reduced to zero, then 12.36% of the allocation was made to adult group and 87.64% to elderly group from day 90 to day100 , 3.00% of the allocation was made to children group, 94.39% to adult group, and 2.61% to elderly group from day 100 to day 110. In the late stage of the pandemic, the allocation ratio was adjusted to that based on population proportion. The sensitivity analysis results showed that as the drug efficacy increased from 0.50% to 0.95%, the cumulative fatal cases under all the three strategies decreased. When the pharmacy production growth rate (k) increased from 0.01 to 0.10, the cumulative fatal cases under all the three strategies showed significant decreases. When k reached 0.07, the specific strategy for population at high death risk outperformed the benchmark strategy and the dynamic optimization strategy.
    Conclusion In the early stage of a respiratory infectious disease pandemic with limited drug supply, a dynamic drug allocation strategy based on multi-stage optimization could significantly reduce the fatal cases caused by the pandemic. Adjusting the allocation plan dynamically according to changes in pharmacy production capacity is an effective way to maximize public health benefits.

     

/

返回文章
返回