2024年基层疾病预防控制机构流行病学相关专业技术人员的卫生统计分析能力及需求情况调查

Investigation of health statistics capability and needs of epidemiology-related professionals in primary-level centers for disease control and prevention in China, 2024

  • 摘要:
    目的 了解中国基层疾病预防控制机构(以下简称疾控机构)流行病学相关专业技术人员卫生统计分析能力的现状、存在的问题和需求情况,旨在为基层疾控机构的卫生统计分析能力建设提供参考。
    方法 采用分层多阶段整群抽样于2024年在县(区)级疾病预防控制中心(以下简称“疾控中心”)的流行病学相关专业技术人员中开展。采用自行设计的调查问卷,通过中国疾控中心流行病学动态数据采集平台编制并发放。采用频数和百分比描述计数资料。
    结果 共调查408个县(区)疾控中心的9 647位流行病学相关专业技术人员(以下简称“工作人员”)。基层疾控机构工作人员中男女性别比为1∶1.71、以本科学历和其他医学类专业为主。工作人员在数据描述与清洗、统计检验、相关回归方面平均掌握率分别为28.88%、18.97%、11.88%。Excel、SPSS和EpiData软件掌握率相对较高,分别为69.56%、36.41%、38.43%。71.10%的工作人员有卫生统计学方面的培训需求,对“基础统计方法”的培训需求最高,占49.45%。86.82%的工作人员对智能化统计工具存在需求,重点集中在自动形成文字报告(84.39%)、图表(84.34%)和分布地图(83.44%)等功能;需求呈现地区与城乡差异,东部和城市对高级方法和智能化工具的需求更高,西部和农村更侧重基础统计描述。
    结论 2024年基层疾控机构工作人员在卫生统计知识掌握和软件操作技能水平上有待提升,对卫生统计知识培训和智能化统计分析工具有高度需求。应针对区域和城乡差异制定差异化培训政策,加大对中西部和农村基层疾控机构的支持力度,并开发和推广智能化统计分析工具。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To understand the health statistics capability and needs of epidemiology-related professionals in primary-level centers for disease control and prevention (CDCs) in China and provide evidence for the improvement of statistical capability building in CDCs at primary level in China.
    Methods A stratified multistage cluster sampling survey was conducted in epidemiology-related professionals in county/districtCDCs of China in 2024. A self-designed questionnaire was distributed through the Epidemiological Dynamic Data Collection Platform of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Categorical data were described by using frequencies and percentages.
    Results A total of 9 647 epidemiology-related professionals in 408 county/district CDCs were surveyed. The male-to-female ratio of them was 1∶1.71, and most study participants had bachelor’s degree and medical backgrounds other than epidemiology. The average mastery rates in data description and cleaning, statistical testing, and correlation and regression analysis were 28.88%, 18.97%, and 11.88%, respectively. The proficiency of software use was relatively higher for Excel (69.56%), SPSS (36.41%) and EpiData (38.43%). Overall, 71.10% of the study participants reported that they need training in health statistics, especially in “basic statistical methods” (49.45%). Additionally, 86.82% of them expressed needs for intelligent statistical tools, especially for those used for automatic generation of narrative reports (84.39%), charts and graphs (84.34%), and distribution maps (83.44%). Needs varied by region and urban–rural setting: the professionals in eastern China and urban areas showed greater demand for advanced methods and intelligent tools, whereas those in western China and rural areas paid more attention to basic statistical description.
    Conclusion In 2024, health statistical knowledge awareness and software use proficiency of epidemiology-related professionals in primary-level CDCs in China remained insufficient, while the demand for training in health statistics and intelligent statistical analysis tools was high. Differentiated training policies should be developed according to regional and urban-rural disparities, greater support should be provided to primary-level CDCs in central and western China and rural areas, and intelligent statistical analysis tools should be developed and promoted.

     

/

返回文章
返回