重组结核杆菌融合蛋白接种6人份法在学校肺结核密切接触者筛查中的应用效果分析

Evaluation of application of 6-person dose recombinant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis fusion protein skin test in screening close contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis cases in schools

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨多人份重组结核分枝杆菌融合蛋白(EC)皮肤实验法在结核分枝杆菌感染筛查中的有效性,为在重点人群筛查中的应用提供数据支持。
    方法 2023年8月-2024年2月在上海市浦东新区选取11所发生肺结核疫情的学校学生密切接触者为研究对象,每名研究对象同时接受EC皮肤试验和γ-干扰素释放试验(IGRA,采取T-SPOT.TB法)检测结核分枝杆菌感染情况,其中EC皮肤试验采取1ml/支规格药剂抽取0.1ml/人,接种6人法。采用χ2检验比较差异,采用Kappa值比较两种方法一致情况。
    结果 共纳入463名研究对象,男性212人,女性251人;大学生304人,中学生124人,教师35人。EC皮肤试验阳性率为4.54%(21/463),IGRA检测阳性率为10.37%(48/463),差异有统计学意义(χ2=117.945, P<0.001);2种检测方法一致性检验Kappa值等于0.46(t=3.478,P<0.001);以IGRA感染检测结果为参考标准,EC皮肤试验灵敏度为35.42%(95%CI:23.43%~49.57%),特异度为99.04%(95%CI:97.55%~99.63%),阳性预测值80.95%(95%CI:60.00%~92.34%),阴性预测值92.99%(95%CI:90.22%~95.00%),约登指数0.35。EC阳性率在不同人口学特征的研究对象间差异均无统计学意义。
    结论 采用1.0 ml/支规格接种6人的EC皮肤试验在学校中筛查结核分枝杆菌感染效果还需要扩大筛查样本及开展平行对照研究进一步探讨实践,同时要考虑IGRA、胸部CT检查作为补充覆盖EC接种禁忌症人群。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of the multi-dose recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis fusion protein (EC) skin test in screening M, tuberculosis infection, and provide data support for its application in screening key population.
    Methods The close contacts of tuberculosis cases in students were selected from 11 school with tuberculosis epidemics in Pudong New Area, Shanghai, from August 2023 to February 2024 as study participants. Each participant underwent both EC skin test and γ-interferon release test (IGRA, using T-SPOT.TB) for the detection of M. tuberculosis infection. For the EC skin test, 0.1mL/person was drawn form a 1.0mL/vial preparation, and administered using a 6-person inoculation method. In the statistical analysis, χ2 test was used to compare the difference, and Kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the consistency between the two methods.
    Results A total of 463 study participants were included, including 212 men and 251 women; 304 college students, 124 middle school students and 35 teachers. The positive rate of EC skin test was 4.54% (21/463), and the positive rate of IGRA test was 10.37% (48/463), the difference was significant(χ2=117.945, P<0.001).The Kappa coefficient for consistency between the two detection methods was 0.46 (t=3.478, P<0.001); Using the IGRA infection test results as the reference standard, the sensitivity of the EC skin test was 35.42% (95% CI: 23.43%−49.57%), the specificity was 99.04% (95%CI: 97.55%−99.63%), the positive prediction value was 80.95% (95% CI: 60.00%−92.34%), negative predicted value was 92.99%(95% CI: 90.22%−95.00%), and the Youden index was 0.35. The differences in EC positive rate among the study participants with different demographic characteristics had no significance.
    Conclusion The effectiveness of EC shin test (administered at 1.0 mL/vial for six recipients) for M. tuberculosis infection screening in schools still requires further evaluation by expanded screening and parallel-group controlled studies. Meanwhile, IGRA and chest CT examination should be considered as supplementary measures to cover populations with contraindications to EC vaccination.

     

/

返回文章
返回