孙燕鸣, 李桂英, 卢红艳. 北京市男男性行为者同伴教育覆盖现状及影响因素分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2021, 36(2): 182-187. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202009070313
引用本文: 孙燕鸣, 李桂英, 卢红艳. 北京市男男性行为者同伴教育覆盖现状及影响因素分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2021, 36(2): 182-187. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202009070313
Sun Yanming, Li Guiying, Lu Hongyan. Coverage rate of peer education and influencing factors in men who have sex with men in Beijing[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2021, 36(2): 182-187. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202009070313
Citation: Sun Yanming, Li Guiying, Lu Hongyan. Coverage rate of peer education and influencing factors in men who have sex with men in Beijing[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2021, 36(2): 182-187. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202009070313

北京市男男性行为者同伴教育覆盖现状及影响因素分析

Coverage rate of peer education and influencing factors in men who have sex with men in Beijing

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解男男性行为者(MSM)中曾受过同伴教育的比例及其影响因素。
      方法  采用同伴推动抽样法招募MSM共600人,进行面对面问卷调查和人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)检测。 采用复杂抽样的logistic回归模型分析接受同伴教育的影响因素。
      结果  MSM年龄均数41.50岁(标准差11.20岁),近1年同伴教育覆盖率为69.71%(95%CI:64.96%~74.46%),多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,对接受同伴教育有统计学意义的关联因素包括:自评HIV感染风险(自评风险没有/较低者接受同伴教育的比例是较高/很高者的2.28倍,95%CI:1.08~4.84倍)、最近一次肛交安全套使用情况(使用者是未使用者的2.08倍,95%CI:1.07~4.04倍),最近1年HIV检测情况(检测者是未检测者的38.32倍,95%CI:20.38~72.06倍),是否曾经患性传播性疾病(患者是未患者的2.52倍,95%CI:1.03~6.22)。
      结论  同伴教育在MSM中接受度高,未来应加强与MSM志愿者的合作,丰富同伴教育的形式和内容,更多关注有高危性行为的MSM。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To understand the utilization of peer education and the related factors of peer education in men who have sex with men (MSM).
      Methods  Respondent-driven sampling tool was used to recruit 600 MSM for a face to face interview with structured questionnaire and HIV test. The factors affecting the peer education were analyzed by logistic regression model of complex sampling.
      Results  The average age of the MSM was (41.50±11.20) years. In the past one year, the coverage rate of peer education was 69.71% (95% CI: 64.96%–74.46%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the significant factors associated with the coverage rate included self-assessed risk for HIV infection (The coverage rate was 2.28 times higher in those who believed to have no risk or at low risk for HIV infection than in those with high self-assessed risk [95% CI: 1.08–4.84]), condom use in last anal sex (The coverage rate in those who used condom in last anal sex were 2.08 times higher than those using no condoms [95% CI: 1.07–4.04]). HIV test in last year (The coverage rate were 38.32 times higher in those received HIV test in last year than in those received no HIV test in last year [95% CI: 20.38–72.06]) and sexually transmitted diseases(STD)history (The coverage rate was 2.52 times higher in those with STD history than in those without STD history [95% CI: 1.03–6.22]).
      Conclusion  Peer education was highly accepted by MSM. In the future, cooperation with MSM volunteers should be strengthened and the form and content of peer education should be enriched. It’s necessary to pay more attention to MSM at high risk for sexual behaviors.

     

/

返回文章
返回