Changes in area distribution of newly detected leprosy cases at different control periods in Jiangxi, 2001−2020
-
摘要:
目的 通过对2001—2020年江西省不同防治阶段新发麻风病例的分布特征及规律进行分析，为麻风病防治提供科学依据。 方法 以江西省各县（市、区）的空间数据库为基础，利用SaTScan 9.6软件对2001—2020年不同防治阶段新发病例按空间和时间−空间两种扫描探测模式进行统计分析，并通过ArcMap 10.5软件将分析结果可视化。 结果 2001—2020年江西省累计新发麻风病例801例，其中儿童病例占1.87%，多菌型占86.02%，2级畸残占20.35%，延迟期在12个月以内的占27.97%，发现方式以被动发现为主，占82.77%。 2级畸残比在不同防治阶段差异有统计学意义（χ2=7.032， P＜0.05）。 发现率从2001年的0.1171/10万下降至2020年的0.0173/10万，年平均发现率为（0.0915/10万±0.0387/10万）。 “十年规划”期间年平均发现率低于“十五”（Z=−3.062，P<0.01）和“十一五”期间（Z=−3.062，P<0.01）。 单纯空间扫描显示，3个时期均出现不同聚集程度的聚集区域，其中“十五”期间出现了1个一类和2个二类聚集区域，“十一五”期间出现1个二类聚集区域，“十年规划”期间分化为3个二类聚集区域，聚集范围呈现扩大化。 时间−空间扫描显示，在2001—2020年期间共探测到2个一类聚集区域和1个二类聚集区域，主要位于江西省南部偏西，聚集年份集中在2004—2005年、2009—2010年、 2011—2015年。 结论 2001—2020年江西省麻风病发现率逐年下降，在空间分布上聚集性程度逐年下降，但是聚集范围逐年扩大。 今后的防治工作不仅要针对聚集区域，同时要重视因聚集范围不断扩大而覆盖的区域。 Abstract:Objective To analyze the spatiotemporal distribution of newly leprosy cases in different control periods in Jiangxi province from 2001 to 2020 and provide evidence for prevention and control of leprosy. Methods Based on the spatial database of counties (districts) in Jiangxi, the statistical analysis on the newly detected leprosy cases reported in Jiangxi at different control periods from 2001 to 2020 was carried out by using SaTScan spatiotemporal scanning statistical software based on two scanning detection modes of space and time-space, and the analysis results were visualized by ArcMap. Results From 2001 to 2020, a total of 801 newly detected leprosy cases were reported in Jiangxi. Among these cases, 1.87% were children under 15 years, 86.02% were multibacillary cases, and 20.35% suffered from grade 2 disability, 27.97% had delayed treatment for ≤12 months and most cases (82.77%) were detected passively. There was significant difference in grade 2 disability ratio in different control periods (χ2=7.032, P＜0.05). The detection rate of leprosy case decreased from 0.1171/100 000 in 2001 to 0.0173/100 000 in 2020, with an average detection rate of (0.0915±0.0387) per 100 000. The average detection rate in the ten-year leprosy risk elimination period was significantly lower than that in the 10th Five-Year Plan period (Z=−3.062, P<0.01) and the 11th Five-Year Plan period (Z=−3.062, P<0.01). The simple spatial scanning showed that there were clustering areas with different clustering degrees in the three periods. There was one category I clustering areas and two category Ⅱ clustering areas in the 10th Five-Year Plan period, one category Ⅱ clustering area in the 11th Five-Year Plan period, and two category Ⅱ clustering areas in the ten-year leprosy risk elimination period, showing an expansion of clustering areas. The spatiotemporal scanning showed that two clustering areas of category Ⅰ and one clustering area of category Ⅱ were detected during 2001−2020, which were all distributed in southwestern Jiangxi during 2004−2005, 2009−2010 and 2011−2015. Conclusion The case detection rate of leprosy decreased and the degree of spatial clustering became lower year by year in Jiangxi, but the clustering areas expanded. Leprosy prevention and control should be strengthened not only in the clustering areas, but also in the newly affected areas in the future. -
Key words:
- Leprosy /
- Newly detected leprosy case /
- Clustering /
- Spatiotemporal analysis
-
图 1 2001－2020年江西省麻风病发现率趋势
Figure 1. Trend in detection rate of leprosy in Jiangxi, 2001−2020
图 2 2001－2020年江西省不同防治阶段麻风病新发病例空间聚集性分布
注：A. “十五”期间一类5个县（上犹县、南康区、崇义县、遂川县、大余县）；第1个二类9个县（章贡区、赣县区、万安县、井冈山市、信丰县、泰和县、于都县、永新县、兴国县）；第2个二类5个县（于都县、赣县区、瑞金市、会昌县、兴国县）；B. “十一五”期间二类25个县（定南县、龙南县、信丰县、安远县、寻乌县、全南县、大余县、会昌县、章贡区、南康区、赣县区、于都县、崇义县、上犹县、瑞金市、兴国县、万安县、遂川县、石城县、泰和县、宁都县、井冈山市、吉州区、广昌县、永新县）；C. “十年规划”期间第1个二类4个县（信丰县、万安县、安远县、泰和县）；第2个二类7个县（上犹县、南康区、崇义县、遂川县、大余县、章贡区、赣县区）；第3个二类8个县（石城县、宁都县、广昌县、瑞金市、南丰县、兴国县、于都县、会昌县）
Figure 2. Spatial clustering of newly detected leprosy cases in different control periods in Jiangxi, 2001−2020
图 3 2001－2020年江西省不同防治阶段新发麻风病例时间–空间聚集性分布
注：A. “十五”期间一类4个县（上犹县、南康区、崇义县、遂川县）；B. “十一五”期间一类3个县（遂川县、井冈山市、上犹县）；C. “十年规划”期间二类16个县（上犹县、南康区、崇义县、遂川县、大余县、章贡区、赣县区、万安县、井冈山市、信丰县、泰和县、于都县、永新县、兴国县、全南县、安远县）
Figure 3. Spatiotemporal clustering of newly detected leprosy cases in different control periods in Jiangxi, 2001−2020
表 1 不同防治阶段新发麻风病例特征分析［例（%）］
Table 1. Epidemiological characteristics of newly detected leprosy cases in different control periods
变量 “十五”期间［例（%）］ “十一五”期间［例（%）］ “十年规划”期间［例（%）］ χ2值 P值 新发病例数 271 264 266 性别 1.121 0.571 男性 202（74.54） 190（71.97） 202（75.94） 女性 69（25.46） 74（28.03） 64（24.06） 年龄 0.462 0.794 非儿童 267（98.52） 258（97.73） 261（98.12） 儿童 4 （1.48） 6 （2.27） 5 （1.88） 型别 5.675 0.059 多菌型 242（89.30） 217（82.20） 230（86.47） 少菌型 29（10.30） 47（17.80） 36（13.53） 2级畸残 7.032 0.03 有 41（15.13） 59（22.35） 63（23.68） 无 230（84.87） 205（77.65） 203（76.32） 延迟期（月） 1.013 0.603 ≤12 80（29.52） 68（25.76） 76（28.57） ＞12 191（70.48） 196（74.24） 190（71.43） 发现方式 2.252 0.324 主动发现 41（15.15） 44（16.67） 53（19.92） 被动发现 230（84.87） 220（83.33） 213（80.08） 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 龙思宇, 余美文, 严良斌, 等. 2011—2015年中国麻风病流行病学特征分析[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志,2017,50(6):400–403. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412−4030.2017.06.003.Long SY, Yu MW, Yan LB, et al. Epidemiological features of leprosy in China from 2011 to 2015[J]. Chin J Dermatol, 2017, 50(6): 400–403. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412−4030.2017.06.003. [2] 王腊梅, 余美文, 刘讯力, 等. 江西省不同流行地区麻风病流行因素分析[J]. 江西医药,2012,47(6):482–486. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006−2238.2012.06.005.Wang LM, Yu MW, Liu XL, et al. Study on factors for leprosy epidemic in different endemic situation in Jiangxi[J]. Jiangxi Med J, 2012, 47(6): 482–486. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006−2238.2012.06.005. [3] 张蓉, 孙继民, 凌锋, 等. 基于SaTScan的浙江省2010—2014年肾综合征出血热疫情回顾性时空分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2017,28(3):244–247. DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.03.012.Zhang R, Sun JM, Ling F, et al. Retrospective space-time scan (SaTScan) analysis on epidemic hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in Zhejiang province from 2010 to 2014[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control, 2017, 28(3): 244–247. DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.03.012. [4] 余美文, 张国成, 严良斌, 等. 2001-2010年中国麻风病流行病学特征分析[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志,2012,45(6):381–383. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412−4030.2012.06.001.Yu MW, Zhang GC, Yan LB, et al. Epidemiological analysis on leprosy in China, 2001–2010[J]. Chin J Dermatol, 2012, 45(6): 381–383. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412−4030.2012.06.001. [5] 李鸽, 王耀斐, 王冠, 等. 1998-2018年陕西省麻风流行特征分析[J]. 中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2019,35(12):715–718. DOI: 10.12144/zgmfskin201912715.Li G, Wang YF, Wang G, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of leprosy in Shaanxi province from 1998 to 2018[J]. China J Lepr Skin Dis, 2019, 35(12): 715–718. DOI: 10.12144/zgmfskin201912715. [6] 马晓雪, 刘航, 洪峰, 等. 1999-2018年贵州省麻风病流行情况分析[J]. 现代预防医学,2020,47(20):3665–3669.Ma XX, Liu H, Hong F, et al. Epidemiological analysis of leprosy in Guizhou province during 1999 to 2018[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2020, 47(20): 3665–3669. [7] Robertson C, Nelson TA. Review of software for space-time disease surveillance[J]. Int J Health Geogr, 2010, 9: 16. DOI: 10.1186/1476−072X−9−16. [8] 张利娟, 徐志敏, 戴思敏, 等. 2017年全国血吸虫病疫情通报[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志,2018,30(5):481–488. DOI: 10.16250/j.32.1374.2018219.Zhang LJ, Xu ZM, Dai SM, et al. Endemic status of schistosomiasis in People's Republic of China in 2017[J]. Chin J Schistosomiasis Control, 2018, 30(5): 481–488. DOI: 10.16250/j.32.1374.2018219. [9] Chen XH, Shui TJ. The state of the leprosy epidemic in Yunnan, China 2011−2020: a spatial and spatiotemporal analysis, highlighting areas for intervention[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2021, 15(10): e0009783. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009783. [10] Wu LM, Shen YL, Yao G, et al. Temporal-spatial distribution characteristics of leprosy: a new challenge for leprosy prevention and control in Zhejiang, China[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2021, 15(1): e0008956. DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0008956. [11] Fischer EAJ, Pahan D, Chowdhury SK, et al. The spatial distribution of leprosy cases during 15 years of a leprosy control program in Bangladesh: an observational study[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2008, 8: 126. DOI: 10.1186/1471−2334−8−126. [12] 吴风志, 何珺, 郑买红, 等. 云南省2005-2015年麻风病新发病例空间分布特点分析[J]. 文山学院学报,2017,30(6):82–84. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674−9200.2017.06.019.Wu FZ, He J, Zheng MH, et al. An analysis of spatial distribution characteristics of the new patients of leprosy from 2005 to 2015 in Yunnnan province[J]. J Wenshan Univ, 2017, 30(6): 82–84. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674−9200.2017.06.019. [13] 戴斯琦, 马璐, 杨敬源, 等. 消除麻风病危害行动前后贵阳市麻风流行病学特征分析[J]. 现代预防医学,2022,49(2):217–221. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003−8507.2022.2.xdyfyx202202006.Dai SQ, Ma L, Yang JY, et al. Analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of leprosy in Guiyang before and after the leprosy hazard elimination campaign[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2022, 49(2): 217–221. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003−8507.2022.2.xdyfyx202202006. [14] 邵红, 杜春用. 怀远县2015－2016年消除麻风运动[C]//2017年全国麻风皮肤性病学术年会论文集. 兴义: 中国麻风防治协会, 2017: 715–718.Shao H, Du CY. 2015−2016 leprosy eradication campaign in Huaiyuan county[C]//Proceedings of 2017 National Leprosy Dermatologic STD Annual Conference. Xingyi: China Leprosy Control Association, 2017: 715–718. [15] 黄贵义, 黄恒英, 林雪峰, 等. 乡村卫生服务一体化管理对麻风病防治的影响[J]. 中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2007,23(9):836–837. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009−1157.2007.09.066.Huang GY, Huang HY, Lin XF, et al. The impact of integrated management of rural health services on the prevention and control of leprosy[J]. China J Lepr Skin Dis, 2007, 23(9): 836–837. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009−1157.2007.09.066. [16] 曾凡荣, 吴李梅, 费丽娟, 等. 浙江省流动人口新发麻风病例流行病学特征分析[J]. 中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2020,36(7):426–428. DOI: 10.12144/zgmfskin202007426.Zeng FR, Wu LM, Fei LJ, et al. Analysis of new leprosy cases among migrating population in Zhejiang province[J]. China J Lepr Skin Dis, 2020, 36(7): 426–428. DOI: 10.12144/zgmfskin202007426. [17] Peng JY, Sun PW, Wang L, et al. Epidemiological features of leprosy in China, 2020[J]. Int J Dermatol Venereol, 2022, 5(4): 231–235. DOI: 10.1097/JD9.000000000000025. [18] Taal AT, Blok DJ, Handito A, et al. Determining target populations for leprosy prophylactic interventions: a hotspot analysis in Indonesia[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2022, 22(1): 131. DOI: 10.1186/s12879−022−07103−0. [19] Bulstra CA, Blok DJ, Alam K, et al. Geospatial epidemiology of leprosy in northwest Bangladesh: a 20-year retrospective observational study[J]. Infect Dis Poverty, 2021, 10(1): 36. DOI: 10.1186/s40249−021−00817−4. -
点击查看大图
图(3) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 107
- HTML全文浏览量: 57
- PDF下载量: 12
- 被引次数: 0
