2020-2023年湖北省外环境中禽流感病毒监测分析

Surveillance for avian influenza virus in external environment of Hubei, 2020−2023

  • 摘要:
    目的 通过对湖北省17个地、市2020—2023年外环境中的禽流感病毒(AIV)分布情况进行调查,分析AIV的流行特征,为制定针对性的预防策略及监测措施提供科学依据。
    方法 采用实时荧光反转录定量聚合酶链式反应(RT-PCR)方法对2020—2023年湖北省外环境监测样本进行甲型流感病毒(FluA)及H5、H7和H9亚型流感病毒检测。 采用描述性流行病学方法对检测结果进行统计分析。
    结果 2020—2023年共采集外环境样本8 514份,检出AIV阳性样本1 842份,总阳性率为21.63%,H9、H5和H7在阳性样本中的占比分别为84.80%、3.75%和0.05%。 2020—2023年的AIV阳性率分别为16.50%、25.35%、24.00%、18.16%,呈先升高后下降的趋势,差异有统计学意义(χ2=65.837,P<0.05)。 各监测场所的AIV阳性率差异有统计学意义(χ2=1 415.746,P<0.05),阳性率最高的是城乡活禽市场(37.03%),最低的是野生候鸟栖息地(0.00%)。 各样本类型的AIV阳性率差异有统计学意义(χ2=200.066,P<0.05),宰杀案板表面样本的阳性率最高(31.84%),最低的是粪便样本(15.90%)。 高发季与非高发季的AIV阳性率差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.978,P<0.05),其中第一季度阳性率最高(22.48%),第三季度最低(18.82%)。 不同地区的AIV阳性率差异有统计学意义(χ2=1 544.622,P<0.001),鄂州市阳性率最高(61.52%),天门市最低(0.80%)。
    结论 湖北省各地区外环境中均存在AIV污染,污染高峰为每年冬春季,以H9亚型为主。 城乡活禽市场污染最为严重,应作为禽流感防控重点场所,加强监测和卫生管理,降低人群感染风险。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the distribution of avian influenza virus (AIV) in external environment of 17 prefectures (municipality) in Hubei province from 2020 to 2023, analyze the epidemiological characteristics of AIV, and provide evidence for the development of targeted prevention strategies and surveillance measures.
    Methods Real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to detect influenza A virus, including subtype H5, H7, and H9, in environmental surveillance samples for avian influenza collected in Hubei from 2020 to 2023. Descriptive epidemiological methods were used for statistical analysis on the detection results.
    Results From 2020 to 2023, a total of 8 514 environmental samples were collected, in which 1 842 were positive for AIV, the positive rate was 21.63%. In the positive samples, the proportions of subtype H9, H5, and H7 positive samples were 84.80%, 3.75%, and 0.05%, respectively. The annual positive rates of AIV were 16.50%, 25.35%, 24.00%, and 18.16% from 2020 to 2023, showing a trend of increasing first and then decreasing, the differences were significant (χ2=65.837, P<0.05). The positive rates of AIV varied significantly with surveillance sites (χ2=1 415.746, P<0.05), with the highest rate observed in live poultry markets in urban and rural areas (37.03%), and the lowest rate in wild migratory bird habitats (0.00%). There were also significant differences in the positive rate of AIV among different types of samples (χ2=200.066, P<0.05), with the highest rate found in samples from cutting boards in slaughterhouse (31.84%), and the lowest rate in stool samples (15.90%). Notably, there were significant differences in AIV positive rate between peak and off-peak seasons (χ2=4.978, P<0.05), with the highest rate in the first quarter (22.48%) and the lowest rate in the third quarter (18.82%). Additionally, significant area specific difference in AIV positive rate was observed (χ2=1 544.622, P<0.001), with the highest rate observed in Ezhou (61.52%) and the lowest observed in Tianmen (0.80%).
    Conclusion AIV contamination is common in external environments in different areas of Hubei with the incidence peak occurring during winter and spring, and the contamination was mainly caused by subtype H9 virus. The contamination in urban and rural live poultry markets was the most severe, indicating the importance to strengthen the surveillance and hygienic management in live poultry markets as a key measure for avian influenza prevention and control.

     

/

返回文章
返回