2021-2022年云南省腾冲市鼠疫疫源地调查与检测结果分析

Investigation and test results analysis on plague foci in Tengchong city, Yunnan province, 2021−2022

  • 摘要:
    目的  了解云南省边境地区腾冲市鼠疫相关宿主动物和媒介昆虫组成和分布情况,以及近期云南省腾冲市鼠疫流行现况,初步评价腾冲市发生鼠疫流行的风险,为鼠疫监测防控工作提供科学依据。
    方法 2021—2022年在云南省腾冲市范围内,采用夹夜法和笼夜法对居民区、农耕区和林区3种不同生境中的小型兽类进行调查取样,梳捡小型兽类体表寄生蚤,对小型兽类及其体表寄生蚤进行形态学分类鉴定,计算构成比、捕获率、染蚤率和蚤指数等,对小型兽类脏器和小型兽类寄生蚤,进行鼠疫菌分离培养;同时采集鼠疫指示动物血清和边境居民血清,采用间接血凝试验对指示动物血清、居民血清和活鼠血清进行鼠疫F1抗体检测。
    结果 捕获小兽4目6科16属26种583只,捕获率8.42%,优势鼠种为黄胸鼠和黑缘齿鼠,构成比分别为19.21%和10.29%,居民区黄胸鼠为绝对优势种,占85.96%,农耕区以巢鼠、黄胸鼠、四川短尾鼩和大足鼠为优势种,林区以臭鼩、针毛鼠、黑缘齿鼠、锡金小鼠和北社鼠为优势种,居民区、农耕区和林区小兽捕获率之间差异具有统计学意义;共检获媒介蚤类5科10属16种210只,总染蚤率为15.95%,总蚤指数为0.36。 四川短尾鼩和黄胸鼠蚤指数相对较高,分别为1.19和0.78,偏远古蚤、缓慢细蚤、斯氏新蚤川滇亚种和印鼠客蚤为优势蚤种,其构成比分别为23.33%、22.86%、16.67%和12.86%,以居民区染蚤率和蚤指数最高为29.82%和1.33;556只动物脏器和210只蚤类经病原学检测均未检出鼠疫菌;血清学检测指示动物(犬、猫)血清201份,活鼠血清76份,边境居民血清430份,指示动物和鼠类血清结果均为阴性,1名边境居民血清鼠疫F1抗体检测呈阳性,流行病学调查未发现近期有动物间和人间鼠疫流行的证据。
    结论 云南省腾冲市小兽及其体表寄生蚤种类较为丰富,家鼠鼠疫主要宿主和主要媒介均为优势种,且分布较广,虽未发现近期有鼠疫流行的确切证据,但存在局部低度流行的风险,仍需加强监测,适时开展预防性防控,有效降低流行风险。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To understand the composition and distribution of plague-related host animals and vector insects, as well as the incidence level of plague in Tengchong, Yunnan province, evaluate the risk of local plague epidemic, and provide evidence for plague surveillance and prevention.
    Methods From 2021 to 2022, the small mammals in three different habitats of residential area, agricultural area and forest area in Tengchong were investigated and captured by night trapping method and cage night method. The parasitic fleas on the body surface of small mammals were collected, and the morphological classification and identification of small mammals and the parasitic fleas were carried out. The composition ratio, capture rate, flea infection rate and flea index were calculated. The organs of the small mammals and parasitic fleas of small mammals were used for Yersinia pestis isolation and culture. Meanwhile, the serum of plague index animals and the serum of local residents and serum of live mice were collected for the detection of plague F1 antibody by indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA) .
    Results A total of 583 rodents, belonging to 26 species, 16 genera, 6 families and 4 orders, were captured, and the capture rate was 8.42%. The predominant species were Rattus tanezumi and Rattus andamanensis, accounting for 19.21% and 10.29%, respectively. Rattus tanezumi was the absolute predominant species in residential areas, accounting for 85.96%. Micromys minutus, Rattus tanezumi, Anourosorex squamipes and Rattus nitidus were the predominant species in agricultural areas, and Suncus murinu, Niviventer fulvescens, Rattus andamanensis,Mus pahari and Niviventer confucianu were the predominant species in forest areas. There were significant differences in the capture rate of rodents among residential areas, agricultural areas and forest areas. A total of 210 fleas, belonging to 16 species, 10 genera and 5 families were captured. The overall infection rate in the fleas was 15.95%, and the total flea index was 0.36. The flea index of Anourosorex squamipes (1.19) and Rattus tanezumi (0.78) were relatively high. The predominant flea species were Palaeopsylla remote, Leptopsylla segnis, Neopsylla stevensi sichuanyunnana and Xenopsylla cheopis, accounting for 23.33%, 22.86%, 16.67% and 12.86%, respectively. The highest flea infection rate and flea index were 29.82% and 1.33 in residential areas. No Y.pestis was detected in 556 animal organs and 210 fleas by etiological detection. The serological detection indicated that 201 serum samples of index animals (dogs, cats) and 76 serum samples of live mice were negative. One of the 430 serum samples from the local residents was positive for plague F1 antibody. No evidence of recent animal and human plague epidemics was found in the epidemiological survey.
    Conclusion Abundant species of rodents and their parasitic fleas exist in Tengchong. The main hosts and vectors of plague in domestic rats are predominant species and widely distributed. Although no evidence of plague epidemic was found, there is a risk of local small spread. It is still necessary to strengthen surveillance and carry out prevention and control in a timely manner to effectively reduce the risk of epidemic.

     

/

返回文章
返回