肖桃, 雷高鹏, 黄伟峰, 吕虹, 刘丽, 杨小蓉, 何树森. 2008-2018年四川省肠炎沙门菌暴发的分子分型比较[J]. 疾病监测, 2021, 36(11): 1172-1178. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202104260227
引用本文: 肖桃, 雷高鹏, 黄伟峰, 吕虹, 刘丽, 杨小蓉, 何树森. 2008-2018年四川省肠炎沙门菌暴发的分子分型比较[J]. 疾病监测, 2021, 36(11): 1172-1178. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202104260227
Xiao Tao, Lei Gaopeng, Huang Weifeng, Lyu Hong, Liu Li, Yang Xiaorong, He Shusen. Comparison of subtyping methods for Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis strains isolated from outbreaks in Sichuan, 2008–2018[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2021, 36(11): 1172-1178. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202104260227
Citation: Xiao Tao, Lei Gaopeng, Huang Weifeng, Lyu Hong, Liu Li, Yang Xiaorong, He Shusen. Comparison of subtyping methods for Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis strains isolated from outbreaks in Sichuan, 2008–2018[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2021, 36(11): 1172-1178. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202104260227

2008-2018年四川省肠炎沙门菌暴发的分子分型比较

Comparison of subtyping methods for Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis strains isolated from outbreaks in Sichuan, 2008–2018

  • 摘要:
      目的  比较四川省肠炎沙门菌暴发菌株的分子分型方法,为暴发溯源提供快速可靠的依据。
      方法  采用脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)、多位点可变数目重复序列分析(MLVA)、规律间隔成簇短回文重复序列(CRISPR)、多位点序列分型(MLST)和基于全基因组测序的单核苷酸多态性(WGS-SNP)对2008 — 2018年四川省肠炎沙门菌暴发分离株进行分型。 以辛普森多样性指数(DI)为指征,比较单一方法及方法联用的分型能力差异。
      结果  PFGE、MLVA、CRISPR和MLST单独使用时,其DI值均<0.9,PFGE_XbaⅠ和MLVA联合使用DI值能提高到0.9以上,WGS-SNP的DI 值最高,可达0.971。
      结论  对四川省肠炎沙门菌暴发菌株进行分子分型的最适方法为WGS-SNP,在缺乏基因组分析能力的情况下,推荐使用PFGE_Xba与MLVA联合的方法。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To compare the molecular typing methods for the Salmonella Enteritidis strains isolated from the outbreaks in Sichuan province and provide evidence for the rapid and reliable source tracing of the outbreaks.
      Methods  Pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus variable-number of tanden-repeat analysis (MLVA), clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR), multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and whole genome sequencing-based Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (WGS-SNP) were used for the subtyping of S. Enteritidis strains isolated from the outbreaks in Sichuan from 2008 to 2018. Simpson Diversity Index (DI) was used as an indicator to compare the subtyping power of a single method and a combination of methods.
      Results  When PFGE, MLVA, CRISPR, and MLST were used alone, the DI values were all lower than 0.9. The DI value of PFGE_XbaⅠ and MLVA increased to above 0.9 when PFGE_XbaⅠ and MLVA were used together. WGS-SNP had the highest DI value (0.971).
      Conclusion  The most suitable method for the molecular subtyping of S. Enteritidis strains isolated from the outbreaks in Sichuan was WGS-SNP. In the absence of genome analysis capability, the PFGE_XbaⅠ+MLVA method is recommended.

     

/

返回文章
返回