任丽君, 周脉耕, 王黎君. 死因登记报告系统现状与发展[J]. 疾病监测, 2008, 23(1): 1-3. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2008.1.1
引用本文: 任丽君, 周脉耕, 王黎君. 死因登记报告系统现状与发展[J]. 疾病监测, 2008, 23(1): 1-3. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2008.1.1
REN Li-jun, ZHOU Mai-geng, WANG Li-jun. Present status and development of death cause report[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2008, 23(1): 1-3. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2008.1.1
Citation: REN Li-jun, ZHOU Mai-geng, WANG Li-jun. Present status and development of death cause report[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2008, 23(1): 1-3. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2008.1.1

死因登记报告系统现状与发展

Present status and development of death cause report

  • 摘要: 死因登记资料的分析结果可以反映一个国家的卫生和经济状况,可以为卫生政策的制定提供依据.2003年,有115个国家向世界卫生组织报告了死因数据,但数据总体质量不高.中国常规死因登记资料主要通过全国疾病监测点(DSP)系统和卫生部死因登记系统收集.DSP系统虽然只覆盖中国总人口的1%,但该系统通过概率抽样形成,监测结果具有代表性;卫生部死因登记系统大约覆盖中国总人口的8%.

     

    Abstract: The analysis of the death cause reports could well reflect both the health and economic conditions of a country, and also establish a basis to develop health policies. 115 nations reported the death cause data to WHO in 2003, of which much higher quality was expected. In China, the data was generally collected via the National Disease Surveillance Points (DSP) System and Vital Registration System of Ministry of Health. The DSP system, which covers 1% of the total population in China, is a representative national sample defined by probability sampling. The Vital Registration System, on the other hand, takes a coverage of about 8% of the whole country.

     

/

返回文章
返回