黄文龙, 洪荣涛, 欧剑鸣, 张莹珍, 蔡少健, 陈彩粼. 2006年福建省医疗机构传染病漏报调查分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2008, 23(2): 90-91. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2008.2.90
引用本文: 黄文龙, 洪荣涛, 欧剑鸣, 张莹珍, 蔡少健, 陈彩粼. 2006年福建省医疗机构传染病漏报调查分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2008, 23(2): 90-91. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2008.2.90
HUANG Wen-long, HONG Rong-tao, OU Jian-ming, ZHANG Ying-zhen, CAI Shao-jian, CHANG Cai-lin . Analysis of the omission of infectious disease reports in medical institutions in Fujian province in 2006[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2008, 23(2): 90-91. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2008.2.90
Citation: HUANG Wen-long, HONG Rong-tao, OU Jian-ming, ZHANG Ying-zhen, CAI Shao-jian, CHANG Cai-lin . Analysis of the omission of infectious disease reports in medical institutions in Fujian province in 2006[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2008, 23(2): 90-91. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2008.2.90

2006年福建省医疗机构传染病漏报调查分析

Analysis of the omission of infectious disease reports in medical institutions in Fujian province in 2006

  • 摘要: 目的 为评价各级政府公共卫生绩效评估考核提供有代表性、客观的传染病漏报率情况.方法 由福建省疾病预防控制中心组织调查人员按福建省医疗机构传染病漏报调查方案对随机抽查的医疗机构进行调查.结果 2006年福建省被抽查医疗机构报告传染病3114例,漏报366例,传染病总漏报率为11.8%,比2005年(5.2%)明显上升.省级医疗机构漏报率最低为2.5%;其次县(区)级为10.6%.乡镇级最高为16.6%.医疗机构平均门诊登记率为74.5%.结论 医疗机构传染病漏报率高于2005年.门诊登记率较低,医疗机构要建立门诊登记制度,做好门诊登记工作.

     

    Abstract: Objective The study provides a representative and objective summary of the omission rates of infectious disease reports to facilitate the assessment of the performance of public health at all governmental levels. Methods The randomized survey was performed in diverse medical institutions based on the Fujian Omitted Reports of Infectious Diseases in Medical Institutions Survey Program by selected investigating officers from the Fujian Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Results A total of 366 omitted cases were found among 3114 inspected cases of infectious diseases in Fujian, the overall omission rate of infectious disease report being 11.8%, with an increase of compared with the rate last year (5.2%). The lowest omission rate was recorded in provincial medical institutions, 2.5%, followed by the county (district) level institutions, 10.6%, while the highest rate was in township institutions, 16.6%. The average outpatient registration rate of medical institutions was 74.5%. Conclusion The omission rate of infectious disease report in medical institutions is higher than that of last year, which is a reflection of the current condition of infectious disease reports in various medical institutions. The outpatient registration rate is relatively low, requiring an established system to ensure better implementation of outpatient registration.

     

/

返回文章
返回