刘天, 揭宝池, 向泉, 毛春林, 熊子杰, 温高媛, 赵婧. 2023年湖北省荆州市一起非职业人群感染的人间布鲁氏菌病聚集性疫情调查[J]. 疾病监测, 2024, 39(3): 290-295. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202311020581
引用本文: 刘天, 揭宝池, 向泉, 毛春林, 熊子杰, 温高媛, 赵婧. 2023年湖北省荆州市一起非职业人群感染的人间布鲁氏菌病聚集性疫情调查[J]. 疾病监测, 2024, 39(3): 290-295. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202311020581
Liu Tian, Jie Baochi, Xiang Quan, Mao Chunlin, Xiong Zijie, Wen Gaoyuan, Zhao Jing. Investigation of an epidemic of human brucellosis in population without occupational exposure in Jingzhou, Hubei, 2023[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2024, 39(3): 290-295. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202311020581
Citation: Liu Tian, Jie Baochi, Xiang Quan, Mao Chunlin, Xiong Zijie, Wen Gaoyuan, Zhao Jing. Investigation of an epidemic of human brucellosis in population without occupational exposure in Jingzhou, Hubei, 2023[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2024, 39(3): 290-295. DOI: 10.3784/jbjc.202311020581

2023年湖北省荆州市一起非职业人群感染的人间布鲁氏菌病聚集性疫情调查

Investigation of an epidemic of human brucellosis in population without occupational exposure in Jingzhou, Hubei, 2023

  • 摘要:
    目的 调查2023年湖北省荆州市一起非职业人群感染后发现的人间布鲁氏菌病(布病)聚集性疫情,为布病防控提供参考。
    方法 采用现场流行病学调查方法,对病例发病过程及感染来源进行分析;采用虎红平板凝集试验及试管凝集试验检测抗体,并采用描述性流行病学方法对疫情资料进行分析。 采用自行设计问卷通过现场问卷调查该地职业人群布病认知情况。
    结果 指示病例从事水产养殖工作,无明确可疑羊接触史,主动就诊发现;溯源调查发现其渔场附近常有羊群出入。 该羊场共有羊77头,采样61份,阳性率为80.32%(49/61)。 经溯源调查,该阳性羊群为外地病羊输入可能性大。 应急监测及病例搜索共采样检测34人,检出阳性3人,分别为指示病例妻子、阳性羊群养殖户夫妻2人。 此次疫情中确诊病例2例,隐性感染者2例。 2例确诊病例先后经多次就医后确诊,发病至确诊时间间隔分别为50 d、89 d。 对该镇所有羊群开展应急监测,共采样190份,未发现其他羊群阳性。 对该镇27名羊养殖职业人群开展调查,布病相关知识知晓率3.70%,27.27%的职业人群工作时存在皮肤受伤情况。
    结论 此次疫情为荆州市首次由非职业人群感染发现的布病聚集性疫情,外市病羊输入可能为此次疫情传染源。 基层医疗机构对布病诊疗意识不足,当地职业人群布病认知及防护意识欠缺。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate an epidemic of human brucellosis in population without occupational exposure in Jingzhou, Hubei province in 2023 and provide evidence for brucellosis prevention and control.
    Methods The study used field epidemiological investigation methods to analyze the incidence and infection sources of human brucellosis. Tiger-red plate agglutination test and tube agglutination test were conducted for antibody detection. Descriptive epidemiological analysis was conducted. Additionally, a self-designed questionnaire was used for on-site surveys to assess the awareness of brucellosis in local population with occupational exposure.
    Results The index case was a fisherman, who had no clear history of contact with suspect sick sheep but was identified through active medical care seeking. Traceback investigations revealed there were sheep flocks near the fishing ground. A total of 61 samples were collected from 77 sheep in the sheepfold, the positivity rate of Brucella was 80.32% (49/61). The positive sheep might be from other area. A total of 34 individuals were surveyed in emergency response, in which 3 positive cases were detected, including the wife of the index case and a couple raising the positive sheep. In the epidemic, 2 confirmed cases and 2 latent infection cases were found. The time intervals between onset and diagnosis for the two confirmed cases were 50 days and 89 days, respectively. Emergency response, with 190 samples being collected from sheep in the town, found no additional positive sheep. A survey of 27 occupational individuals in the town showed a brucellosis-related knowledge awareness rate of 3.70%, with 27.27% of occupational individuals reporting skin cuts in works.
    Conclusion This was the first epidemic of brucellosis in population without occupational exposure Jingzhou. The source of infection might be infected sheep from other area. It is necessary to strengthen the training of brucellosis diagnosis and treatment in local medical workers and health education about brucellosis prevention in local population with or without occupation exposure.

     

/

返回文章
返回